Introduction to interactive video

April 28, 2009

The purpose of this blog was to learn as much as possible about the topic of interactive video. Through my investigation this is what I have learned.

What is interactive video?  Interactive video is, obviously, video that a viewer can interact with in some way. I have broken this down into three levels of interactivity.

First is the lowest level of interactivity. This is done through audience choosing what they want to watch and when they want to watch.  An example of this is the New York Times website .You can choose from a variety videos from breaking news to technology and you can also choose to share the video by emailing it or posting it on a social network. Beyond that there’s not much else for the viewer can do.

An example of the second level of interactivity is also from the New York Times but in this instance we are looking at their YouTube channel.

nytimeschannel

As with the previous level, the viewer can choose which videos he or she wants to see; but, now, the viewer can also interact with the creators or at least those who post the video as well as other viewers. This is done in the form of comments and ratings.  The video titled, “World: U.S. Concerns As Taliban Advances-NYTimes.com/Video”    had 3,722 views, 40 comments and 12 ratings at the time this was written.  When viewers are allowed to interact at this level, a community begins to form an as we will discuss later on, this could be valuable to both journalists and entrepreneurs.

The third level of interactivity comes about when viewers can affect the video. At this level, videos can be affected in two different ways. The first is by using preselected video components and the second is by choosing what happens next in the video or in the next installment of the video. Journalists, for obvious reasons, cannot choose what happens next in the story; but they can find out what the viewer wants next from them. In the last post, I mentioned the web series I Heart Vampires.Instead of telling the writers how to behave in an upcoming scenario, viewers can tell journalists how they should proceed in the coverage of a certain topic. iheartvampires

 

The last level of interactivity takes the form of mash-ups. Mash-ups, the way I am using the term, means things are being done to add to the video. Allow me to explain in more detail. With certain websites creators can place links and other effects onto the video. As discussed earlier, with Overlay.tv, users can take a video and add products, karaoke, add text, record video, add a Twitter feed, draw on the video, add sounds and links to a video. The viewer can then interact with the modifications made by the creator. 

In the examples, we touched on how interactive videos are being used but I would like to spend a little more time with that. From my research, news sites spend much of there time in the first level of interactivity. They are stuck in the top down approach to video. They put the video out there and we the viewer watch it. 

The second and third levels of interactivity are for people with shared preferences and the desire for community. The third level differs from the second in that it is the beginning of more professional content that also has good interactivity. The fourth level seems to be more for professional for profit organizations. 

How can entrepreneurs use interactive video? Depending on the type of venture, this could vary. Generally, interactive video could be used to get your product or service known. Placing videos on sites like YouTube can bring awareness to your product. It can also help develop a community that would keep people coming back to your product or service. 

YouTube and Ooyala both have ways to track the audience viewing your video. This could help entrepreneurs in two ways. The first could be in the early stages before you put your product on the market. If the video was done properly to attract who you believe your target audience to be, then you could use the metrics of the video to see if those are the people you are actually reaching.

Second, a similar plan could be implemented for after the product goes public. Once you know whom your target audience is you can use the metrics of the videos to see if you are still reaching those people. The metrics can also tell you if there is a group that you could be reaching more but are not and they could also tell you if you need to change anything about your target audience. If you have targeted a certain group but none of them are interested in your video, then you know you have to find a new way to reach your audience or modify your marketing strategy to better reach the people who are interested in the product.

Here is an example of YouTube’s Insight, their way of keeping track of video performance.

 

Along with the other reasons, interactive video can be helpful in entrepreneurship, companies like Overlay.tv  can also bring some revenue in by selling appropriate goods through the video. Its ability to link to other sites from the video can improve community if that is the type of venture you are starting. It can also point to related products or other helpful information that might draw people to your product. 

Now that we have touched more on interactive video’s entrepreneurial implications, what are some of its journalistic implications? 

Because, journalists now need to think more entrepreneurially than they have before, there are a few overlaps between the journalistic and entrepreneurial implications. Similar to entrepreneurs, Journalists can use all levels of interactive video to get their brand out and depending on the type of journalist, he or she can also get their product out. There are millions of different websites and content creators on the web and with that much competition, it is difficult to gain an audience. Interactive video allows the journalist to do that. 

With new means of collaboration, community on the Internet is becoming increasingly important. Interactive video allows journalists to build that community.  That is  not to say that once the journalist builds his  or her audience community, he or she can just let it go. The community must be worked on to keep it alive. 

The community coupled with the ability to interact can help journalist do their job better. Journalists can hear from their audience what they want to be covered. The audience can have a say in how a specific story is covered going forward. They can also tell the journalist what else they want to know on a topic or if they have any unanswered questions. They cal also tell the journalist if there is a story that needs to be covered but has not been yet or if they’ve had enough coverage of a certain issue and would like to move on to something else.  

Links in videos either through YouTube annotations or through overlays can allow online video journalists to link to other stories either in print or in video or other background information. One of the more interesting features of Overlay.tv is that it allows you to put Twitter feeds on your video. 

overlaytwitter

Journalists can use this function to show their Twitter feed or other pertinent Twitter feeds depending on the subject of the story. This will give the audience more information on the subject at hand. 

This and other interactive functions make the experience of gathering video news more customizable. A viewer can choose to have a story with more in-depth coverage by viewing the story with the Twitter feed or through going to other linked items or the viewer can choose less in-depth coverage, in this case, by “hiding” the Twitter feature or by choosing not to click on linked portions of the video. 

The other Overlay.tv functions can provide some sort of income for the journalist. The journalist can let viewers purchase topic related products. Given that Overlay.tv works with specific companies, the journalist may need to find a company that has more appropriate products. 

To learn about interactive video, I spent a lot of my time on Google News searching for interactive video.

googlenewsiv

 I  used Mashable a lot as well. Again, I searched for “interactive video” to get information but I also used their YouTube channel. Along with going to the website  I am  also following them on Twitter

I spent a lot of time actually on the YouTube site looking at videos as well as looking at their videos that dealt with more of their business functions. I am also following them on Twitter and I read their blog.

After reading about a website that seemed interesting to me, I would spend some time with it and in some instances try out some of the features. These are some of the things that you could do to get more aquatinted with interactive video. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I have learned so far

April 23, 2009

There are a few levels of interactivity

1. Audience interacts by choosing what they view and when they view it. 

2. Audience interacts by choosing what they view and when as well as interacting with the creators of the videos in the form of vlogs in many cases.

3.  Audience effects videos

        1. Choosing between certain pre-selected video components  (Hoobastank video)

            2. Choosing what happens next in the video (I heart vampires)

4. Mashups (Overlay.tv and Ooyala). creators add things to videos and audiences interact by clicking links to learn more about a subject or to purchase an item. 

 

Interactivity that moves beyond clickable links within a video and allows interaction with the video or creator of the video has not been as monetizeable. YouTube, which allows you to interact with the video through clickable links, the creators of the video and the timing of viewing has had to make certain changes in an attempt to make money through advertising.

Interactive video has made it easier to  impulse buy and to engage the audience which are two of the three tenants of new advertising. 

Interactive video may be the direction new advertising is heading; but, I am not sure how interested people will be in watching these videos designed only to get the audience to purchase goods.

I <3 Vampires

April 23, 2009

I stumbled upon I <3 Vampires watching Heather’s Vlog so I thought it would be good to discuss. The characters have a vlog about Confessions of a Teenage Vampire, a fictional Twighlight. The audience sees some vlog entries as well as events that occur “offline.” The audience can comment and rate the video and answer questions posed by the characters in their vlog. The ability to communicate with other viewers, the creators and have a hand in the creation of the next video are important parts of interactive video in my opinion. 

I am not sure how popular a show like this would be if the plot line was not so similar to the actual events of the last book in the Twilight series. From reading the comments, it seems like the majority of the viewers are Twilight fans. I would be interested to see if similar style program would be as popular if it had a different plot line. 

As I said, I like the level of interaction but I feel the interaction by response to vlog questions may not translate to other audiences.

Interactive video on your television

April 21, 2009

i2tv.tv wants to bring your Internet viewing experience to the television. On their about us page, they say with 24 hours your uploaded video will be viewable on television either through a channel or your video on demand feature. There is also a link to write your television provider to get i2tv capability on your television. They also say new interactive features will be coming. What I like about this is the community aspect. You can have friends on the site and share videos with them.  I don’t know how I feel about watching video on TV.  Since it doesn’t look like my provider has i2tv capabilities, I couldn’t check it out to see what it is actually like.

From at least attempting to create visuals for both the Internet and television, the way you go about creating the two are very different. When creating video for the Internet you are creating it to be seen by one person a few feet away from the screen; whereas for TV, the video is made for the masses. Videos on the Internet are usually more personal than video for television and I’m not sure how Internet video would translate to television

On a similar note, some of the videos I watch on-line, I may not want to watch with other people. It is a little embarrassing to admit how many times I’ve seen the dramatic prairie dog video and the multitude of remixes.

Will the novelty wear off?

April 21, 2009

With companies such as Overlay.tv and Ooyala,  I wonder how people will respond to user generated content specifically intended to sell the audience something.  I certainly wouldn’t buy  something because some unknown person put it on their video in an attempt to make money.  If one of my favorite vloggers were to annotate a link to purchase an item, that wouldn’t be a problem for me. I wouldn’t think they were doing it for the soul purpose of generating revenue. I would think, the vlogger really liked this product and if I want to buy it, here is a way to do that.

Overlay.tv is cool because of the level of technological interactivity or more specifically, how much the creator can modify the video and show it off to the user. To me, there doesn’t seem to be much interactivity beyond that. Interactive video means a conversation or an interaction between the viewer and the video. The only way viewers interact with these videos is by purchasing products they see in the videos or going to links in the video.

You may say, “Well, that’s more than the level of interactivity you get from YouTube.” To that, I would say yes…BUT, with YouTube, the interactivity is not about getting you to buy something, it is about sharing and community. With YouTube, you can not only interact with the video but you can interact with the creators of the video. A you-tubers goal is not primarily to sell you something. With Overlay.tv, unless I’m stupid, which is a possibility, I see no place for comments. I see a chat function; but, I must admit I was a little too intimidated to try it out because I have no idea who I am chatting with. On the couple of videos I’ve looked at there is no previous conversation to join, I’d just be saying “hello” to God knows who. 

The interactivity of sites like Overlay.tv may be cool but the novelty will wear off with people who are looking for a fun or interesting videos to share with their friends.

Ooyala interactive video advertising

April 21, 2009

Ooyala provides similar capabilities to Overlay.tv but more discreetly.  In one of the demo videos, a person, for example me, may not have realized right away that the video had click-able links in it, that would appear on the side of the video. The Control Group demo video has more obvious links but still, in my opinion, not as intrusive as overlay.tv. Although, the Control Group demo video linked to primarily to YouTube videos and Flickr photos, the same function can be used to monetize video. 

Unlike Overlay.tv, Ooyala‘s focus does not seem to be on video creation it is on the advertising and metrics. A company may go to Ooyala for its analytic capabilities and not for its interactive video component. 

Similar to Overlay.tv, Ooyala is using interactive video only to monetize and not necessarily to connect in anyway beyond that.

Make money with Overlay.tv

April 21, 2009

Overlay.tv are a supped up version of the Youtube ads that ask if you want to purchase a song you are watching on iTunes. Using video sites such as YouTube and other affiliated sites, Overlay.tv allows the user to place different objects over their video.  For example, to make money, a user can place a widget on their video that lets the viewer purchase an item from one of their affiliates. If the product is purchased the creator of the overlay will share in the commission. 

 

Other widgets allow the creator sing with the video, or add linkable text. A creator can record their own video or get another video and embed it into their overlay creating a video mash-up. You can draw on the video, add sounds links or clipart. One of the cooler things, in my opinion, the creator can do, is add a favorite twitter feed to the video. 

 

While Overlay.tv fits the three tenants of new advertising, “make it easy to impulse buy, give away content, and get viewers involved or ‘engaged’” and has customers such as The Jonas Brothers and Disney among others, I think the site will need to gain more popularity before people can start making a lot of money with it.

Interactive egg hunt

April 21, 2009

 I saw this video a few weeks ago, on YouTube of course and I thought it was a good example of really interactive video.  Nayders07 uses annotations to allow the view to hunt for hidden Easter eggs. I saw a video similar to this with a magic trick but the trick wasn’t too great. If I hadn’t figured it out already when it went around through email, it wouldn’t have been too hard to figure it out now. Anyway I just thought the video was interesting and fun even if it is a few weeks old at this point.

YouTube Redesign? Really?

April 21, 2009

So it has been a few days with the “redesign” if you want to call it that. I don’t really know what all the hype was about. The change is barely noticeable and I have to say, I’m not too impressed. I am happy to see that user generated content has not been completely pushed aside as I had imagined it would be. I am unimpressed for two reasons:

 

1. The professional content that, from what I understand, would’ve been a saving grace for YouTube on the advertising front is barely noticeable. It can be seen in the spotlight section and if you click on the tab shows tab. I think if the redesign is going to be profitable, the professional content should be more noticeable.

 

2. The professional content that is on there, in my opinion, is not very good. Out of all of the TV shows, I would watch maybe 10 of them…if I had to. The only one I clicked to actually watch the show was Fear Factor Australia because I like seeing how things vary between cultures. The movies are a little bit better but; for someone who will watch just about anything, there isn’t a lot I would choose to see. I would like to know what kind of market research was done when they chose what professional content to put up. In their video about advertisers I mentioned in the previous post, they note how YouTube can be used to advertise to every demographic but I don’t see that in their professional content selections.

YouTube’s Redesign

April 16, 2009

With the rumors that tomorrow YouTube will change its format to resemble sites such as Hulu in hopes to make it more appealing to advertisers. I thought I would take a look at what they are doing now to attract advertisers. To do this I watched their videos about advertising. 

In one of their videos they say, ”go ahead target any type of person and we have sophisticated tools to find them on YouTube. String together some adjectives of your choice and discover an active community ready and waiting. Then it’s your choice what format and enviroment will work best to reach your key audience.” 

YouTube seems to rely on advertising to make their money but so far they have been unsuccessful at doing so. According to articles like the one in CrunchGear, Hulu generates more money because it’s professional content is more attractive to advertisers. Companies don’t want to be associated with some of the amateur, user generated content that has made YouTube so popular. 

It is understandable that advertisers want to associate with videos that will enhance their brand. There are professional channels for news such as the New York Times and television channels like CBS; they are just more difficult to find. They are lumped together with all of the other content.

When I first heard about the redesign, I thought it would mean the end of all the reasons I like YouTube and user generated content. If this redesign makes professional outlets easier to find and that  makes advertisers more comfortable, which means YouTube will have a chance of monetary success then I will do my best to embrace it.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.